Does it still make any feel to hold dividing strains or barriers between sciences or disciplines? In other phrases, are epistemological hierarchies nonetheless valid? Wouldn’t it be more efficient, starting with coaching, that the narratives have been free of limitations among them? As information advances, issues make bigger and intertwine.To the factor that we will verify that the contemporary information ends up reflecting our lack of knowledge lots extra than our answer to the various problems. In reality, the maximum profound questions stay open for discussion.
I trust this is a blessing in as a minimum approaches. First, at any moment, new “truths” may be reached – albeit provisional, which may be translated with the aid of the classic expression of the Austrian logician Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889-1951): “to factor out the bottle”. Second, it’s miles important to apprehend that this unfinished search permits us to be rationally loose from the kingdom of other guys. At this point, we can say, then, that philosophy is actually only a method. In other words, philosophy does no longer give us expertise, but know-how, and this can be frustrating, as Sir Anthony Kenny stated.
In flip, Wittgenstein takes this philosophical understanding characteristics of philosophy extra as the experience of a journey than as the advent at a destination. (And journey is the whole thing; that’s what we examine from Konstantinos Kaváfis’ poem “Ithaca”). In short, for Wittgenstein, philosophy is a manner or activity. Finally, these reflections take us lower back to classical Greece. It seems that we’re always coming “domestic” in philosophy. Therefore, we ask: does the search for the essence of factors as a purpose instigated by means of Socrates make any sense? After so many centuries, the founding stance seems to be losing its raison d’être. In any case, and here comes Wittgenstein’s thought, we want, possibly, to apprehend philosophy or the search for know-how as a look for clarity.
Therefore, assembly the longing for generality, we ought to conclude, with Wittgenstein, that it’s miles no longer feasible to forget the specific statistics, but to keep in mind that after assembling a version of description of the phenomenon or facts under observe, we’ve already accomplished the whole lot or almost the whole thing that became possible to do proper now. The constantly provisory characteristic of human research.
After all, Wittgenstein recognized that the logical structure of language can be visible on its surface. The Austrian sage did now not want to suggest theories. But describe in detail what goes on: this summarizes your analysis. In summary, it is as much as the philosopher to “placed things” surely. The Wittgensteinian technique is, consequently, descriptive. His contribution to the history of philosophy specializes in approach.